Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight

YOUR AD HERE!

A Window into the Charedi World | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

OPINION
& COMMENT

HOME
& FAMILY

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

News
The Amendment to the Religious Councils Law is Approved on its First Reading in the Knesset

by E. Rauchberger

The chareidi representation in the Knesset scored a most important achievement this past Monday, when the Knesset, with 51 supporters, as opposed to 46 opponents and 2 abstentions, approved the amendment to the Law of Religious Councils, which, it is hoped, will prevent the inclusion of the Reform and Conservative in the religious councils.

This amendment states that on halachic issues, every religious council will be obligated to operate under the instructions of the Chief Rabbinate and the local rabbinate, and that every member of a religious council will have to obligate himself to operate according to this law. The Reform and Conservative will, it is assumed, not reconcile themselves to submission to the Chief Rabbinate, and therefore it is hoped that this will prevent their entry into the religious councils.

The law was approved after many efforts to enlist all of the various components of the coalition to vote for the amendment. However, the main reason for its passage is that most of the Arab Knesset members were absent from the voting. The efforts of MK Chaj Yichya of the Labor party, who supported the law, are particularly noteworthy.

Knesset members Rabbi Avrohom Ravitz and Rabbi Meir Porush of UTJ, as well as Rabbi Arye Deri of Shas, worked strenuously over the past few days in order to ensure a majority for the law, and especially to persuade the Arab Knesset members not to participate in the voting.

Even ministers and Knesset members of the coalition who are not particularly known as supporters of religious issues, such as Minister Refael Eitan (Tsomet), Minister Avigdor Kahalani and MK's Yehuda Harel (Haderech Hashlishit), Naomi Blumenthal and Zeev Baum, supported the law.

On the other hand, coalition MK's Eliezer Zandberg (Tsomet) and Alex Lubotzki (Haderech Hashlishit) voted against the law, as did the three of the Knesset members of Yisrael Ba'Aliya. MKs David Levi and his younger brother Maxim of Gesher did not support the law, and preferred to be absent. Their fellow Gesher member, David Magen, opposed the law. Benny Begin and Dan Meridor did not vote.

Most of the members of the opposition parties voted against the law. The chairman of the Labor party, MK Ehud Barak, opposed the law, as did the former Prime Minister Shimon Peres.

The members of the chareidi and religious parties in the Knesset were very satisfied with the results of the vote and with the approval of the first reading of the law, and asked that the law be approved as soon as possible in its second and third reading, which would make it take effect.

At the end of the voting, pandemonium erupted in the Knesset plenum, after Yossi Sarid called the law antisemitic. His remarks drew vociferous reactions from the coalition and from the religious MKs, and contradictory remarks from the opposition. Knesset chairman Dan Tichon threatened to terminate the session.

Arab MK Talab Elsana explained the reason for the abstention of his faction, saying that its members had decided not to interfere in internal religious affairs of the Jewish Nation. He expressed his hope that the Jewish Knesset members would behave similarly regarding controversial issues within the Arab populace.

After this vote the government was shocked when its Arrangements Law, an essential part of the budgetary process, was defeated in the Knesset by a vote of 55 to 55 with two abstentions. UTJ made its support for the Arrangements Law contingent on passage of the Religious Councils amendment, and it voted in favor of the Arrangements Law. Two members of Yisrael Ba'Aliya abstained in the vote, including Cabinet Minister Yuli Edelstein, and thereby caused the law to fail. The government, which had worked very hard to ensure passage and thought that it had succeeded, said it would present this essential law again later in the week.

Parliamentary observers said that this failure emphasizes the need for early elections, showing that the government does not have the votes to govern.


 

All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.