Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

8 Adar 5762 - February 20, 2002 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home and Family
Eyes Right
by Rochel T.

I think it was about ten years ago that I noticed my arms getting too short. I'm not sure, but I believe that it was just around the time that they started printing the telephone directory in smaller print. When I reached the point where I couldn't read the fine print on a passport application, I figured it was time to see an eye doctor.

He tested me and sure enough, told me that it was `age- related,' a condition called `presbyopia'. It seems that the aging eye cannot change focus as easily as a younger one. Reading glasses were the obvious solution. Here began the "Where are my glasses?" period. Of course, I did have a permanent place for them, however, they were often not left there. I tried the chain- around-the-neck trick, but the chain always got stuck in my sheitel. Furthermore, the term `reading glasses' is actually a misnomer, since after a while, especially after a few years of progressively stronger corrections, I needed them for such delicate work as cutting tomatoes. The on-again, off-again syndrome would peak at the supermarket or in a bookstore, when I couldn't use my reading glasses while scanning the shelves, but did need them for checking a hechsher or for a sneak preview of a book.

Next step: bifocals? Who, me? Wasn't that for old people and those who have worn glasses all their lives? Well, I must admit that I did wear glasses as a child, from age 2 through 16. Victim of the `lazy eye' syndrome, I remember doing follow-the-number exercises with a red pencil and a patch over one eye. But I threw away those glasses as a teenager, with the doctor's permission.

I then entered a world of progressive glasses. This wondrous invention mimicked bifocals, since they somehow seamlessly merged a correction for distance on top, a middle range correction in the middle, and a reading correction on the bottom. I was free of the glasses search! I can't say I loved having glasses permanently perched atop my nose, but what was the alternative?

There was only one hitch: try as I might, I couldn't use these progressives at the computer unless I liked having a permanent stiff neck: since the correction for close-up is at the bottom of the lens, one has to pick up one's neck to see the computer screen.

So what was the solution? You guessed it. Another pair of glasses -- for computer use only. Every time I sat down at the computer, I took off the progressives and put on the computer (`reading') glasses. That worked just fine.

Until one day, we decided to look into getting contact lenses for my teenage daughter. Now I remember when contact lenses were so expensive that people took out insurance for them! I had vaguely heard talk about hard and soft and disposable, but really let this information pass over me. Well, it seems that contacts are no big deal any more. An hour later, my daughter walked in with her new lenses.

The neighbors noticed, of course, and the compliments were well received. During the conversation, I mentioned that, of course, I could never wear contacts because I was a progressive. Lo and behold, one neighbor told me about something called monovision. This is a system in which one eye is corrected for distance and one eye is corrected for close-up. It sounded crazy to me but my neighbor assured me that it worked.

I did some research and found that this system can work for up to seventy percent of the people who try it, that it takes a period of adjustment and it was sometimes a problem for drivers, which didn't apply to me. So off I went to the friendly optometrist who definitely felt I was a candidate. He tested me and fitted me wth ONE contact lens. Since, according to his findings, my right eye was dominant and needed no correction for distance, the left eye could be corrected for close-up with the use of only one contact lens.

At the beginning, it took me 20-30 tries to get it in my eye correctly. It certainly SEEms much harder than it LOOKS. It was somewhat hard to read with since my field of vision was limited. Let's say, one could read a book easily, but scanning a newspaper was more difficult. As a couple of weeks went by, the insertion process sped up and I was happy with my lens except for the computer. It was hard to see things like commas and periods, a vital part of my day. Evidently, correcting just one eye for close work was insufficient. I refused to compromise on my eyesight.

So what was the solution? Back to the bifocals? Certainly not! I capitulated to another pair of glasses. These are clear in one eye and correct the other for close work. In other words, these are my contact lenses-computer glasses. My old computer glasses switch off with my progressives when I am not wearing my contact (singular), like when I have just woken up.

I guess us aging baby-boomers have to come to grips with a lot of things, like realizing that we are no longer 18. But there are various options open. I'm not even going to consider surgical monovision correction. We must daily thank Hashem for the sight we have, and ask Him to help us guide our eyes to see only the good things.

 

All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.