Dei'ah Vedibur - Information &
Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

8 Nisan, 5780 - April 2, 2020 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

POPULAR EDITORIALS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
chareidi.org
chareidi.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NEWS
We and Our Children and Our Children's Children

by HaRav D. Yoshor

Yisroel Say . . . and Believed in Hashem and His Servant Moshe

During a Shabbos meal in Maran HaRav Moshe Feinstein's home, a visitor told the following story. A Jew who needed a yeshu'ah travelled to a famous Rebbe known as a tzaddik who effected yeshu'os. When he arrived the Rebbe first told him: "I want you to be aware that a yeshu'ah is dependent upon emunah. If you do not believe in me, all your efforts in coming here are in vain." The Jew answered: "Rebbe, even by the splitting of Yam Suf the Torah writes (Shemos 14:31) "Yisroel saw the great hand which Hashem did upon Egypt" and only afterwards the Torah writes "[the people] believed in Hashem." We see that emunah comes after the yeshu'ah. The Rebbe should first bring me a yeshu'ah and afterwards I will believe in him." The Jew won that argument and the Rebbe first gave him a yeshu'ah. This is what the visitor told HaRav Moshe Feinstein zt'l.

The Rosh Yeshiva answered that there is an elementary difference between saving a whole mass of people and saving an individual and therefore the kashyeh is not a good one. Moreover we can differentiate between two types of emunah: One emunah is knowing that Hashem can do everything, is Master of all, is more powerful that any power in the world, nothing can stop Him, no one can do anything without Him, and a person himself has no power whatsoever. Am Yisroel had this particular emunah before the splitting of Yam Suf since they saw the miracles in Egypt and had already learned that lesson. Even before the splitting of Yam Suf the Torah writes "Bnei Yisroel cried out to Hashem" (Shemos 14:10).

There is, however, another type of emunah. Even after a person knows that HaKodosh Boruch Hu can do everything and everything is done through His desire, a person still does not know whether Hashem wants to save him and make a miracle for him, to what degree He wants to change nature for him. Bnei Yisroel were lacking that emunah and could not compare one matter of emunah to the other. Even after they saw that HaKodosh Boruch Hu had made the water sweet for them, later when they were thirsty for water in Moroh they complained: "Maybe we were worthy for a miracle of yesh mi'yesh (out of something already existent) to make bitter water sweet, but not for a miracle of yesh mi'iyin (out of something hitherto non- existent) to extract enough water for six hundred thousand people from a rock." Bnei Yisroel had many similar fears because of their lack of emunah.

Nevertheless, we see there were two types of bitochon. The first type of bitochon, the basic one, bnei Yisroel were surely blessed with. They knew that Hashem can help them and only He can help them, and to Him they cried for salvation. Every person must embrace this emunah. The Rebbe who said that this type of emunah is a precondition to having a yeshu'ah was completely right. However, bnei Yisroel still did not believe that HaKodosh Boruch Hu would want miraculously to change nature for them. They reached this understanding, the second emunah, only after the miracle, and then the Torah writes (Shemos 14:31) that they "believed in Hashem and His servant Moshe." They then understood that Hashem was prepared to make that miracle for them too.

(Arzei HaLevonon)

Who Redeemed Us and Redeemed Our Fathers

On Purim we say the berochoh of she'osoh nissim la'avoseinu (Who did miracles for our fathers) but we do not include that miracles were performed for us too, as we do in the berochoh on the seder night. Why should there be any difference? If a person thanks Hashem for the miracles his fathers experienced it is as if they were done for him, he should include this point in the berochoh of Purim too. Why only on Pesach?

HaRav Shlomoh Zalman Auerbach zt'l explains: There are two different types of miracles. One miracle had it not been our fathers would not have been born. For such a miracle it is impossible to say in the berochoh that Hashem had redeemed us since we would not have existed without the miracle.

Another type of miracle is like our being freed from slavery in Egypt. Even if HaKodosh Boruch Hu would not have redeemed our fathers we would have been born. Of course, we would have been on a low spiritual level because of the tumah in Egypt, but we would have been alive. In such a case it is relevant to include in the berochoh that a miracle was done to us.

This is similar to the story told about HaRav Chaim of Volozhin who once made a berochoh of she'osoh li neis bamokom hazeh (Who made for me a miracle in this place) when he passed the place where a miracle was done for the mother of his Rav, the Vilna Gaon. In the zechus of that miracle the Vilna Gaon was born.

R' Chaim made a berochoh that specified the miracle was done to him since even without it R' Chaim would be alive. It would not definitely be the same R' Chaim, but he would be alive. He would not be on the same spiritual level to which he was zocheh because of his being a talmid of the Gra. The miracle in that place changed his spiritual condition and therefore it was proper for him to make the berochoh.

(Hagodos Talelei Oros)

The Sea Saw it and Fled

The seforim cite an amazing Midrash: "What did [the sea] see? It saw the beraissa of R' Yishmo'el." There are many pilpulim somehow to explain that apparently incomprehensible Midrash. When HaRav Eliezer Zalman Meltzar zt'l, the author of the Even Ha'Ozel and the rosh yeshiva of Slutzsk, was asked about the Midrash he answered that it is based on an explicit Gemora in Sanhedrin (73a): "From where do we know that one is allowed to save the person being pursued with intent to kill by first killing the pursuer? There is a hekeish: `For as when a man rises against his neighbor and slays him even so is this matter" (Devorim 22:26). What did we learn from a murderer? The halochoh of a murderer comes to teach and we learn something about it too. Just as we are allowed to save a na'arah me'orosoh by killing the adulterer so can we save a person from murder by killing the murderer. And from where do we know this halochoh about a na'arah me'orosoh, as the beraissa of Dvei R' Yishmo'el teaches us: `The na'arah me'oroshoh cried out, but there was none to save her' (v. 27) — but if there were someone to save her he could save her in any way possible."

When the Egyptians chased after bnei Yisroel the sea saw the beraissa of R' Yishmoel that allows saving someone from his pursuer and therefore saved them from the Egyptians.

(Arzei HaLevonon)

 

All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.