Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

4 Kislev 5765 - November 17, 2004 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

Opinion & Comment
Subjugating Nature for Avodas Hashem

by HaRav Menachem Dan Meiseles

Part I

"`And behold, a dreadful darkness fell upon him' (Bereishis 15:12). This darkness symbolizes Greece, that darkened the eyes of Yisroel with their decrees. They ordered Yisroel to write on the ox's horn that they have no part in the Elokim of Yisroel" (Bereishis Rabbah 44:17).

"When the kingdom of wicked Greece grew strong, they enacted massive and peculiar shmad decrees on Yisroel to destroy their religion. They decreed that the Jews must desecrate the Shabbos, that they may not perform bris milah, and that each Jew must write on his garment that he has no part in Hashem the Elokim of Yisroel. He must carve the same on his ox's horn and afterwards plow with it. This decree continued about fifty-two years" (Rambam in Igeres Teiman).

It is amazing that of all these decrees, apparently the least harmful was carving on an ox's horn a declaration of having no part in the Elokim of Yisroel. Someone not owning an ox would naturally be excluded from that decree, and others owning an ox could sell them. The Midrash Chanukah (in Osef Beis Hamedrash) indeed writes that the Jews immediately sold their animals.

Nevertheless Chazal, in the abovementioned Midrash, conclude that this decree in particular symbolizes the Greeks' darkening the eyes of Yisroel. What is the reason?

We infer that this decree has profound significance and encompasses the very substance of the Greeks' decrees. We learn from what the Maharal of Prague writes briefly about this matter (in Ner Mitzvah) that the Greeks intended by their decree to allude to the sin of the Golden Calf (Cheit Ha'eigel). They aimed to prove that the Jews' sin of the eigel actually shows that they had no part in the Elokim of Yisroel.

The Maharal cites the gemora's statement (Brochos 32b) that HaKodosh Boruch Hu promised that He would forget the episode of the eigel, as is written, "These too may be forgotten" (Yeshayohu 49:15).

Furthermore, we must understand why the Greeks decided to force the Jews to carve their declaration on an ox's horn and not on the ox's body. The Rambam adds that this decree included requiring them "afterwards to plow with it." What does their plowing later on have to do with the decree? Why was carving on the ox's horn insufficient?

The Difference Between an Ox and a Donkey

The ox (shor) is considered to be a symbol of a high spiritual level, and its image is carved in the Throne of Glory (Yechezkel 1:10). The ox is the king of the beheimos (Chagigah 13b) and it is the primary korbon: "When an ox or a sheep or a goat is born . . . and thenceforth it may be accepted for a korbon isheh for Hashem" (Vayikra 22:27, and Midrash Rabbah).

The donkey is symbolic of the lowest spiritual level. Its name — chamor — testifies its being an entirely material entity — fully chomriyus (materialism). "You must know that there is no creation simpler than the donkey, which is entirely physical. A physical entity — chomer — is a formless one. Since the donkey is inclined towards the physical — the chomer — it is the simplest creature in the Creation . . . It is the simplest animal of all the beheimos in the world" (Gevuros Hashem, chap. 29).

"The ox (shor), whose name is related to the Hebrew Ashurenu (I will see him) but not now' (Bamidbar 24:17), is on a lofty level in the higher worlds and the celestial brilliance. Tzaddikim are called shor, as we find by Yosef who was called a shor. A donkey (chamor) means chomriyus, which implies the body" (Ma'or VaShemesh on the posuk, "You shall not plow with a shor and a chamor together" — Devorim 22:10).

If we consider only superficially, we may not understand why the ox was chosen as a symbol of higher things than the donkey. The ox is an extremely crude animal that eats a lot, and its way of eating is unrefined (it sullies the grass with its saliva and later eats it, see Metzudas DovidTehillim 106:20 — on the posuk, "An ox that eats grass). Its horns frighten its entire vicinity and the Gemora discusses at great length the dinim concerning the damages it causes.

On the other hand, a donkey is modest and strong. Its needs are minimal, and the benefit derived from it is enormous. It carries heavy loads without complaints and is grateful to its owner (see Rashi, Bereishis 49:14 on the posuk, "Yissochor is a strong-boned donkey" and the Radak on Yeshayohu 1:3).

*

"Rovo said: Iyov attempted to free the whole world from responsibility for their acts. He said `Ruler of the World! You created an ox — its hooves are cloven. You created a donkey — its hoofs are solid. You created tzaddikim, you created reshoim. Who can prevent You from doing what You wish?' " (Bovo Basra 16a).

The ox did not earn its status of kashrus through the merit of its efforts to advance its avodas Hashem or through its exemplary character traits. Likewise the donkey is not tomei for eating because of any unethical character traits.

It is a Divine decree that one animal would be created with signs of tohoroh while the other would have signs of tumah. Similarly, we find tzaddikim in whom it appears that the yetzer tov is naturally implanted, while we find reshoim who were apparently created with an overwhelming yetzer hora. If such is the case, then those who sin are compelled to do so because of their innate nature and should not be punished. Likewise, tzaddikim who were born with an inclination towards good do not merit reward for their good deeds. The conclusion: there is no free choice! This was Iyov's way of freeing the world from responsibility for its deeds.

This distinction, or to be more precise this lack of distinction, between an ox and a donkey is likely to lead us to another, even sharper, conclusion: there is no difference between tumah and taharoh; there are no higher spiritual levels and no lower ones. There are indeed differences between one physical entity and another, but these differences are measured by what can be seen, measured, and discerned — and only by these means!

The Cheit Ha'eigel Disproves the Level of the Shor and of Yisroel

Greek wisdom is purely natural science. "May Elokim beautify Yefes" (Bereishis 9:27). The children of Yefes received a Divine gift: wisdom to understand the natural world.

The ancient Greeks set the foundations for all the exact sciences and paved the way for research into the Creation's secrets. The world was created with the attribute of Elokim, which is the attribute of strict judgment.

Nature lacks any element of free choice. Everything is compelled to behave according to the rules that HaKodosh Boruch Hu implanted in it with His wisdom. By more deeply examining the Creation we reveal more and more of its laws and its miraculous organization. This attests to the existence of a Master over the world, through whose strength and guidance the entire world's wonderful arrangement was laid down. "In the beginning Elokim created" — "with wisdom He created" (Targum Yonoson on Bereishis 1:1).

Greek scholars observed the Creation's marvelous organization and concluded that the entire world is "compelled." There is nothing in the Creation dependent upon a free will. Everything, including man, is compelled to act in the way it acts.

These "wise" men announced that there is no difference between a shor and a chamor. Besides the physical differences that can be proven, no other difference is possible. There is no judgment in the world and no Judge.

Man is compelled to act as he does and is no better than an animal that cannot change its nature and inclinations. Nature (teva in Hebrew, which is the gematria of Elokim) created reshoim and tzaddikim. It is possible only to train or perhaps also educate man somewhat, but no change in his essence is possible. It is a "natural law" that a wise person will remain wise, an idiot an idiot. A quick- tempered person will continue quick- tempered, and a lustful person will carry on his way. (See the "Eight Chapters" of the Rambam, chap. 6, where he cites the philosophers' ideology. I explained the essence of Greek wisdom in an article called "Greek and Torah Wisdom," printed in Digleinu, Kislev, 5753).

Greek Wisdom is an "external" wisdom including only the understanding of what can be seen in the external world. Even when scientists reveal magnificent laws of nature, hitherto hidden, this, according to them, is not a deep analysis of the world's secrets. It is merely revealing what exists. It makes known what until now, because of our lack of discernment, was unknown to us.

The true "inner" wisdom is the Divine power in the Creation, a power that is hidden from and higher than our powers of perception. It is not accessible to them.

End of Part I (of 4)

The author is the Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivas Radin in Netanya.


All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.