Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

29 Av 5760 - August 30, 2000 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

 

Sponsored by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

Produced and housed by
Jencom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home and Family
Parental Involvement in Sibling Conflict
by Masha Wolf, M.A. Child Therapist

Part I

Sibling rivalry and conflict, read: fighting, is an ongoing problem for parents. Some siblings seem to fight constantly and over almost everything. Siblings fight for technical reasons like living in close quarters; they fight over material possessions and over physical, academic and emotional superiority, and they fight because of jealousy or resentment of the others' privileges and talents. Children sometimes fight with siblings when they are troubled by something altogether unrelated because they feel relief in letting out frustrations that they wouldn't vent upon anyone else but their siblings. Sometimes children simply fight and incite each other for fun, attention or out of boredom.

Another reason children fight is for parental love and attention. Each child, especially in a large family, wants to feel that he is special to his parent. Parental attention is seen by the child as an indicator of his importance to the parent. When a child fights with his siblings, he will often try to win the parent over to his side of the conflict. The child wants the parent to take his side in the conflict by confirming his rightness or victim status. Although parents need to involve themselves in their children's conflicts to teach them interpersonal skills and to prevent physical danger, inappropriate involvement in sibling rivalry is a potentially hazardous pitfall that can be avoided.

Parental involvement in sibling conflict usually takes one of several forms and each form has different consequences to the sibling relationship. The first scenario, although rare, is one in which parents completely decline resistance in their children's conflicts. The parents' role is one of non- involvement. This results in the older or stronger child winning most conflicts. The younger or weaker child who is often the victim will feel that he is not being protected. He will most likely feel that the older child or the aggressor is the favored child while he, the younger child, does not have an important place in the family and is not as cared for as his sibling. This can result in great animosity among siblings, general bitterness and resentment, and strong feelings of insecurity.

Another role that parents commonly assume is that of judge or referee. Children bring their squabbles to parents for dispute and the parent acts as judge as to whom is right or wrong. The parents make decisions much as a dictator would -- independently of the subjects, according to how he sees fit. This type of interaction may cause the children to be in constant competition for the parent's attention and favors. Each will want the parent to take his side, thereby gaining attention and the favored status. Children may find it more worthwhile to be in conflict than to be at peace because their fighting gains them the parental attention they so desperately seek.

A third and more ideal role that parents can take in sibling conflict is that of mediator. Parents do involve themselves in their children's conflicts when necessary and when they do, they take on the role of facilitator and objective peacemaker. When parents act as mediator, they help children solve their own problems and try to remain objective in the conflict. The parents teach the children skills for conflict resolution. As the parents decline judgment in the conflict, children will find it more worthwhile to make peace. The parent helps and greatly encourages the peace process, granting both children greater attention for resolving their conflict than for the conflict itself.

Parents sometimes find it difficult to know when to involve themselves in their children's conflicts and when to remain detatched. There are some basic rules that may help parents make their decision. Parents have an obligation to educate their children and to keep them safe. When children are involved in normal bickering and there seems to be no danger, parents can usually safely ignore the fighting. When bickering becomes prolonged or heated, parents may need to get involved to insure the safety of the children involved in the conflict. This may include separating the children until they have calmed down. Another time that parents may feel the need to become involved in their children's fights is if an argument occurs clearly in front of them, especially if there is a wrong being done, such as abusive language or any kind of physical violence. This is important because if a child knows that the parent witnessed a wrongdoing against him and did nothing to champion him, he may feel unprotected by the parent. This could cause resentment and insecurity.

If children have become physically abusive and the parents fear that there is a danger, or that the fight is becoming too aggressive, they may decide to spearate the children. Parents may decide to separate the children for a set amount of time. The ideal time-out should be long enough to allow the child to calm down and to deter him from repeating the act but not long enough to be traumatic. Alternatively, a parent may tell children they can be together when they feel ready to play nicely with one another. A parent may also find it necessary to stop abusive language among siblings.

Next part: Mediating Disputes

Masha Wolf, M.A., Child Therapist, provides play therapy to children and educational guidance to parents. Call evenings: 02-656-2172.

 

All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.