Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight

A Window into the Charedi World

17 Shevat 5759 - Feb. 3, 1999 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

OPINION
& COMMENT

HOME
& FAMILY

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

News
Knesset Protects Religious Councils

U.S. Aguda to Reform: Tone Down the Rhetoric

B. Isaac

Agudas Yisroel of America has welcomed the Israeli Knesset's passage of legislation to preserve the integrity of the country's religious councils, which serve the religious needs of the general population. At the same time, the organization expressed its dismay at what has been described as the hysterically bitter reaction of Reform and Conservative leaders to the law's passage. The legislation was designed to restore an essential element of Israel's "religious status quo"--the secular State's uncodified modus vivendi with the country's observant population--which has been severely undermined by recent rulings by the High Court of Justice.

Agudas Yisroel's executive vice president, Rabbi Shmuel Bloom, contended that the passage of the law was "both a tribute to reason and a step toward ensuring true Jewish unity." "It is nothing short of bizarre to imagine Jews who do not subscribe to Jewish dietary laws overseeing supervision of establishments claiming to observe those laws, or people for whom a mikvah is a mere symbol treating the construction of one as would someone to whom it is a sacred ritualarium."

Rabbi Bloom stressed that a multitude of standards threatens Jewish unity. A single standard--that of halacha has always been, and continues to be, the only guarantor of Jewish unity.

Rabbi Bloom also expressed his organization's dismay at the "hyperbolic hysteria" of some who opposed the law.

"We are deeply distressed," he said, "at comments like those of Knesset member Yossi Sarid, who called the legislation "antisemitic" and asserted that it "discriminates against Jews for being Reform or Conservative."

"Such rhetoric," Rabbi Bloom commented, "is precisely the opposite of the careful, objective reasoning the Jewish world so desperately needs today. Would a law granting only scientists the right to sit on a `science council' be anti- laymen? Would it be accurate to say that it `discriminates' against non-scientists?"

Even more troubling, in Agudas Yisroel's view, were threats made by Reform leaders against Knesset members who voted in favor of the law. Uri Regev, who heads the Reform movement's Israel Religious Action Center, was reported in the Israeli press as having warned those members that they "would get theirs" and would be boycotted by Diaspora communities.

The head of the Association of Reform Zionists in America, Ammiel Hirsch, singled out former Defense Minister Yitzchak Mordechai--a recently declared candidate for prime minister. He said Mr. Mordechai's vote in favor of the legislation would make it "very hard" for his fledgling political party "to raise funds in the North American Jewish community."

The group also scored statements of Reform and Conservative representatives who said that, to take their seats on the councils, they would simply sign the loyalty oath regardless of their true beliefs.

Thus, for example, in a statement quoted by The New York Times, Conservative leader Ehud Bandel said: "We will take the pledge required by law, though our interpretation of it might be different than that intended by the lawmakers."

"For Bendel and other Reform and Conservative representatives who have made similar statements," said an Agudas Yisroel spokesman, "it seems that though the law insists that commitment to the Rabbinate is of paramount importance, it all depends on what the meaning of `is' is."


All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.